THE CONCEPT OF FOREGROUNDING IN THE WAKE OF THE DEVELOPMENTS OF STYLISTICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52340/PUTK.2023.2346-8149.07Keywords:
foregrounding; linguistic stylistics; cognitive stylisticsAbstract
The concept of foregrounding occupied much of Jakobson’s time stylistics. Through the influence of later and recent developments in the field of stylistics, this concept has undergone deep alteration and has been taken to a new level. This paper aims to discuss, on the one hand, its emergence and evolution. On the other, it endeavors to examine its validity from today’s perspective.
Full Text (PDF)
References
Adamson, Sylvia. 2001. “The Rise and Fall of Empathetic Narrative: A Historical Perspective on Perspective” In Van Peer and Chatman, S. (eds), New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective. pp.83-99. New York: State University of New York.
Aristotle. 1941. Poetics. In R. McKeon (ed.), The Basic Works of Aristotle. pp.1455-87. New York: Random House.
Bloomfield, W. 1976. “Stylistics and the Theory of Literature.” New Literary History 7 (2): 271-311.
Bradford. R. 2005. Stylistics (The New Critical Idiom). New York: Taylor and Francis e-library.
Burke, M. 2014 a. Introduction – “Stylistics: From Classical Rhetoric to Cognitive Neuroscience.” In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, M.Burke (ed.). 1-7. New York: Routledge.
Burke, M. 2014 b.“Rhetoric and Poetics: the classical heritage of stylistics”. In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, M.Burke (ed.). pp.11-30. New-York: Routledge.
Burke, m. and Evers, k. 2014 . “Formalist Stylistics” In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, M.Burke (ed.). pp.31-44. New-York: Routledge.
Cook, G. 1994. Discourse and literature: The Interplay of Form and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eagleton, T. 2003. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Fourth.ed. Minneapolis: The Minnesota University Press.
Fialho, O. 2007. Foregrounding and refamiliarization: Understanding Readers’ Response to Literary Texts. Language and Literature, 16 (2), 105–123.
Fialho, O. 2012. Self-Modifying Experiences in Literary Reading: A Model for Reader Response. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Alberta.
Fludernik, M. 1993. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge.
Freeman. M. 2000. Poetry and the Scope of Metaphor: Toward a Cognitive Theory of Literature. In A Barcelona (ed.)Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. pp.253-281. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
Hakemulder, J. 2004. “Foregrounding and Its Effect on Readers’ Perception.” Discourse Processes 38 (2): 193-218.
Jakobson, R. 1960. “Linguistics and Poetics: A Closing Statement.” In T.A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language. pp.350-377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Leech, G. and Short, M. 1981. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction of English Fictional Prose. London and New-York: Longman.
Miall, D and Kuiken. 1994. Foregrounding, Defamiliarization, and Affect Response to Literary Stories,” Poetics 22: 389-407.
Miller, G. 1980. “Stylistic Rhetoric and the Analysis of Style: An Annotated Bibliography.” Style 14(2):75-102.
Short, M. 1989. “Speech Presentation, the Novel, and the Press” In: van Peer (ed.), The Taming of the Text: Explorations in Language, Literature, and Culture pp.61-81. London: Routledge.
Simpson, P. 1993. Language, Ideology, and Point of View. London: Routledge.
Simpson, P. 2004. Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge
Stockwell, P. 2010. Cognitive poetics. In: P. C. Hogan, ed. Cambridge Encyclopedia of the language sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press: 169–171.
van Peer, W., 2002. “Why we need empirical studies in literature.” In: S. Zyngier et al., eds. Fatos & Ficções. pp.17–23. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro,
van- Peer W. and Hakemulder, J. (2006). “Foregrounding.” In: Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (ed. Keith Brown), 2nd ed. Volume 4, pp. 546-550. Oxford: Elsevier.
van Peer, W. 2007. “Introduction to Foregrounding: A State of the Art.” Language and Literature 16 (2):99-104.
Zyngier, S. et al. 2007. ”Complexity and Foregrounding: In the Eye of the Beholder?” Poetics Today 28 (4):653-682.
