Evaluation System

According to the evaluation policy of the journal, the  reviewers are independent of the authors and are not affiliated with the same institution.

All articles submitted will be evaluated using a 100-point scoring system.

The article has a very good chance of being published in a Journal if both of the reviewers agree that the manuscript is good (positive assessment is considered 51 points and  more).

The articles will be assessed using the following criteria:

• Content-related criteria (maximum score: 20 points)
  There are examined:  topicality of the assigned task and goal of the research.
• In-depth analysis and quality of a research (maximum score: 20 points)
  There are checked: developing of the ideas presented by the author fully; in-depth and thorough study of a problem; accuracy of argumentation, concretization and complexity; relevance of scholarly literature with the researched subject.
• Data reliability (maximum score: 20 points).
  Checking for the accuracy of data:  whether the author is based on first source of data; if all the cited sources are given in the reference list of the mentioned article.
• Layout of the article (maximum score: 20 points).
  There are checked: if the article is well organized, whether each paragraph is sufficiently extensive.
• Conclusions (maximum score: 20 points).
  There are checked: novelty and significance of the researched results; whether the conclusions are logical or not.

Notice: Reviewers should remain anonymous throughout the review process and beyond. The article will be rejected if its rating appears less than 51 points.