REALISATION OF IMPOLITENESS/RUDENESS STRATEGIES IN DEBATES BETWEEN THE PRESIDENT AND OPPOSITION MEMBERS OF THE GEORGIAN PARLIAMENT
Keywords:
parliamentary discourse, impoliteness, face-threatening actsAbstract
This paper deals with special signals which show that parts of the message are not right on-line with the message of the moment. On the basis of talk shows, these signals are examined according to setting, communicants‟ roles and culture. After a thorough study of linguistic and empirical data, verbal, non-verbal and paraverbal bracket signals have been classified; as a result, verbal and non-verbal signals have been singled out as initiators of bracket constructions. The study has revealed that bracket signals can be initiated by the speaker himself or by another person or they can be provoked by an external noise, fact or listener‟s reaction. Correspondingly, two groups of bracket signals can be distinguished: bracket signals initiated by the speaker and bracket signals initiated by external factor. Bracket signals are also classified according to their function and the following groups have been singled out: 1) showing opinion, 2) apologizing; 3) showing gratitude; 4) specifying something; 5) repairing; 6) giving advice; 7) asking for silence; 8) expressing emotion.
Full Text (PDF)
References
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1978) “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena”, Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987) “Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage”, Cambridge University Press. pp: 65 – 69.
Brown, P. (2015) “Politeness and Language”, “The International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences”.
Culpeper, J. (2011) “Impoliteness - Using Language to Cause Offence”, Lancaster University pp: 19 – 22.
Franklin, M. & Norton, P. (1993) “Parliamentary Questions”, Clarendon Press.
Harris, S. (2001) “Being politically impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse”, Discourse & Society, SAGE.
Ilie, C. (2001) “Un-parliamentary Language: Insults as cognitive Forms of Confrontation”, John Benjamins.
Ilie, C. (2003) “Discourse and Meta-discourse in Parliamentary Debates”, Journal of Language and Politics.
Kienpointner, M. (2008) “Impoliteness and emotional Arguments”.
Limberg, H. (2009) “Impoliteness and Threat Responses”, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.41, pp: 1376 - 1394.
Locher, M.A.; Sage, L.G. (2010) “Interpersonal Pragmatics”.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1993) “Principles of critical discourse analysis, Discourse and Society”, vol.4, pp: 249 - 283.
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S. and Yates, S. J. (2001) “Discourse Theory and Practice” A Reader ; SAGE Publications In association with the Open University.
Yule, G. (2011) “Pragmatics”, Oxford University Press. pp: 48 - 64; 71 – 75.
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Online Journal of Humanities ETAGTSU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The peer-reviewd scientfic journal Online Journal of Humanities (OJH) CC BY-NC Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence for its users. It is fully open-accessed and ready to use, reproduce, disseminate or display the article provided that the author is attributed as the original creator and that the reuse is restricted to non-commercial purposes (i.e. research or educational use).
