GENDER DIFFERENCES IN EMOTION FRAMING

Authors

  • Natia Zardiashvili

Keywords:

gender stereotypes, framing, sociolinguistics

Abstract

Expressing and understanding emotions can be considered one of the key activities of our lives. However, at times, the feelings of a person might be misinterpreted or the initial emotional response in a partner might be misunderstood. There have been various studies concerning the differences in emotion expression between male and female target groups (Chaplin 2015). This research discusses the issues of emotion framing in public discourse paying particular attention to the ways male and female speakers frame emotions and influence the audience. Consequently, the article focuses on emotion framing and compares two presidential candidacy speeches (Hilary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s) from the USA elections recorded in June 2015. The research showed that both speakers follow the same pattern of emotion framing (positive social identity construction-framing-emotion implication) but used different techniques and emphasise different values throughout the speech. These differences were linked to Hofstede’s (1983) definition of cultures with high versus low masculinity rate and finally, assumptions were made about how gendered stereotypes influence different ways of framing emotions.

Full Text (PDF)

Author Biography

Natia Zardiashvili

Expressing and understanding emotions can be considered one of the key activities of our lives. However, at times, the feelings of a person might be misinterpreted or the initial emotional response in a partner might be misunderstood. There have been various studies concerning the differences in emotion expression between male and female target groups (Chaplin 2015). This research discusses the issues of emotion framing in public discourse paying particular attention to the ways male and female speakers frame emotions and influence the audience. Consequently, the article focuses on emotion framing and compares two presidential candidacy speeches (Hilary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s) from the USA elections recorded in June 2015. The research showed that both speakers follow the same pattern of emotion framing (positive social identity construction-framing-emotion implication) but used different
techniques and emphasise different values throughout the speech. These differences were linked to Hofstede’s (1983) definition of cultures with high versus low masculinity rate and finally, assumptions were made about how gendered stereotypes influence different ways of framing emotions.

Full Text (PDF)

References

Biehl, M., Matsumoto, D., Ekman, P., Hearn, V., Heider, K., Kudoh, T., & Ton, V. (January 01, 1997). Matsumoto and Ekman's Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion (JACFEE): Reliability Data and Cross-National Differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 1, 3-22.

Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2008). Gender and emotion in context. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (p. 395–408). The Guilford Press.

Chaplin, T. M. (2015). Gender and Emotion Expression: A Developmental Contextual Perspective. Emotion Review, 7(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914544408

M., Matsumoto, D., Ekman, P., Hearn, V., Heider, K., Kudoh, T., & Ton, V. (January 01, 1997). Matsumoto and Ekman's Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion (JACFEE): Reliability Data and Cross-National Differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 1, 3-22.

Hofstede, G. (1983). National Cultures in Four Dimensions: A Research-Based Theory of Cultural Differences among Nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 13(1/2), 46-74. Retrieved March 29, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/40396953

Holmes, J. and Schnurr, S. (2006), ‘Doing femininity’ at work: More than just relational practice1. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10: 31-51. doi:10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00316.x

Published

2020-06-24

How to Cite

Zardiashvili, N. (2020). GENDER DIFFERENCES IN EMOTION FRAMING. Online Journal of Humanities ETAGTSU, (5), pages 16. Retrieved from https://etagtsu.tsu.ge/index.php/journal/article/view/31

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories