The Conceptual Metaphor UNDERSTANDING/KNOWING IS HEARING in Georgian Language and Culture

Authors

  • Nino Daraselia Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University

Abstract

This paper, which is part of the ongoing research, deals with one of the instantiations of the generic-level conceptual metaphor COGNITION IS PERCEPTION, namely, UNDERSTANDING/KNOWING IS HEARING in the Georgian language and culture (the issue almost unexplored in Georgian). In order to reveal the significance of the mentioned metaphor for the Georgian language community, intrafield (i.e., across sensory modalities) as well as transfield (i.e., across different domains) semantic extensions reflected in Georgian lexemes for the hearing modality were studied and compared with metonymic and metaphoric extensions linked to the vision and intellection domains.The research was conducted within the framework of cognitive linguistics, lexical semantics, cultural studies and Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences. The results of the study show that for intrafield semantic extensions across sensory modalities in Georgian, the hearing modality is at the top of the hierarchy. Regarding patterns of transfield semantic extensions, alongside widely accepted image-schemas associated with hearing (hear>heed>understand>obey), Georgian lexical units tend to develop meanings of considering, getting the message, grasping the idea, believing, learning something, realizing and knowing. The paper argues that the importance of hearing to the Georgian language and culture stems from the primacy of musical and interpersonal intelligences within the community.

Author Biography

Nino Daraselia , Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University

Dr.Nino Daraselia is an associate professor at the Department of English Philology, Faculty of Humanities, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University. Her research interests include Cognitive Linguistics, Discourse Analysis, Sociolinguistics and Pragmatics.

References

Abuladze, I. (1973). ʒveli kartuli enis lekslk’oni, masalebi. (Dictionary of Old Georgian, Materials). Mecniereba.

A Comprehensive Georgian-English Dictionary. (2006). D. Rayfield (Editor-in-Chief). PC version presented by www.dachi.com.ge

Barcelona, A.(1997). Cognitive Linguistics: A Usable Approach. Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa. No.6/2: 7–32, Retrieved on February 5, 2023, from https://dialnet.unirioja.es >descarga articulo.

Caballero, R., & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013). Ways of Perceiving, Moving and Thinking: Revindicating Culture in Conceptual Metaphor Research. Cognitive Semiotics, 5, (12), 268-290. Retrieved on January 15, 2023 from https”//www.degruyterbrill.com>documents.

Classen, C. (1993). Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and across Cultures. Routledge.

Daraselia, N. (1998). Silence: General Characteristics and Determining Factors. In M. Machavariani (Ed.) gza enisaken (The Way to Language). (pp 38-45) Arn. Chikobava Institute of Linguistics. Kartuli Ena.

Daraselia, N. Metaphors Understanding/Knowing is Hearing and Understanding/Knowing is Seeing in Georgian Language and Culture. (Paper Presentation). Cognitive Linguistics in the Year 2025 (September 17-19, 2025). UKEN Institute of English Studies, Krakow, Poland. https://ptjk2025.uken.krakow.pl.

Evans, N. & Wilkins. D. (2000). In the mind’s ear. The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language, 76(3). Baltimore: The Linguistic Society of America. (pp.546-592).

Gardner, H. (2011): The Frames of Mind. The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.

Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford University Press.

Georgian Monolingual Dictionary, www.ena.ge

Ghlonti, A. (1971). kartuli leksik’ologiis sapuʒvlebi (Bases of Georgian Lexicology), Ganatleba.

Gibbs, R.. W. Jr. (2005): Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press.

GNC, The Georgian National Corpus, clarino.uib.no>gnc>corpus-list.

Howes, D. (ed.). (1991). The Varieties of Sensory Experience. A Sourcebook in the Anthropology of the Senses. University of Toronto Press.

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2019). Perception Metaphors in Cognitive Linguistics: Scope, Motivation, and Lexicalisation. In L.J. Speed, C. O’Meara, L.San Roque, & A. Majid (Eds.) Perception Metaphors. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. (pp 42-64).

Johnson, M .(1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. The University of Chicago Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2008). Universality and Variation in the Use of Metaphor. In N.L.Johannesson, & D.C. Minugh,(Eds.) Selected Papers from the 2006 and 2007 Stockholm Metaphor Festivals. Stockholm University. (pp.51-74).

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor and Culture. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica. 2,2 (2010). (pp. 197-220). Retrieved on April 2, 2022 from https://acta sapientiae.ro:philologica.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In A.Ortony, (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press. (pp.202-251).

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. The University of Chicago Press.

Melikishvili, D. (1999). ʒveli kartuli pilosopiur-teologiur t’erminologiis istoriidan. (From the History of Old Georgian Philosophical-Theological Terminology). Tbilisi State University Press.

Ong, W. (1991). The Shifting Sensorium. In D.Howes.(Ed.) The Varieties of Sensory Experience. University of Toronto Press. (pp.25-30).

Orbeliani, S.S. (1991). leksik’oni kartuli: sitq’vis k’ona (A Dictionary of Georgian: A Bunch of Words). Merani.

Sakhokia, T. (1979). kartuli xat’ovani sitq’va-tkmani (Georgian Figurative Expressions). Merani.

Sharifian, F.(2003). On Cultural Conceptualizations. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3.3 (2003). Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden. (pp.187-207).

Sumbadze, N. (1999). The Social Web. Friendship of Adult Men and Women. DSWO Press, Leiden University,The Netherlands.

Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structurre. Cambridge University Press.

Traugott, E.C. & Dasher, A.B. (2004). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge University Press.

Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-Collectivism and Personality. Journal of Personality.69:6, December 2001. (pp.907-924). Retrieved on May 13, 2023, from https://onlinelibrarywiley.com.

Viberg, A. (1984). The verbs of perception: a typological study. In B.Butterworth, B.Comrie, and Ö. Dahl, (Eds.), Explanations for Language Universals. Mouton de Gruyter. (pp.123-162).

Yu, N. (2008). Metaphor in Body and Culture. In R.W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press. (pp.247-262).

Published

2026-09-24

How to Cite

Daraselia , N. (2026). The Conceptual Metaphor UNDERSTANDING/KNOWING IS HEARING in Georgian Language and Culture. Online Journal of Humanities ETAGTSU, (11). Retrieved from https://etagtsu.tsu.ge/index.php/journal/article/view/143

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories