Challenges of Phraseological Translation in the Era of AI: Georgian-Russian MT Perspectives and the Role of Intermediary Languages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55804/ETAGTSU.2346-8149.2026.08Keywords:
machine translation (MT), artificial intelligence (AI), phraseology, Georgian language, intermediaryl, computational stylistics, digital linguisticsAbstract
This article examines the core challenges of translating phraseological units in Machine Translation (MT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI), focusing on the Georgian-Russian language pair. Phraseologisms, characterised by cultural specificity and semantic indivisibility, pose a significant hurdle for automated systems that often rely on morphological and syntactic analysis rather than deep semantic synthesis. This research adopts a complex comparative-experimental methodology, analysing translations of idiomatic expressions from Mikhail Javakhishvili’s novel Arsena Marabdeli within the digital framework of the Electronic Text Analysis Group at Tbilisi State University (ETAG-TSU). By comparing professional human translations with machine-generated outputs, this study identifies critical failures in AI systems, including literalism, an inability to distinguish homonyms, and misinterpretation of cultural and biblical realia. Furthermore, the paper investigates the computational stylistics of phraseological transformations in literary prose, highlighting how algorithmic models struggle with authorial style and figurative nuances. A key finding is that English serves as a “pivot” or intermediary language in the Georgian-Russian MT process, introducing additional phonetic and lexical errors. The paper concludes that, for AI to achieve functional proficiency in translating idioms, it must be equipped with extensive electronic corpora, Parallel Idiomatic Corpora, and Specialised Knowledge Graphs in which phraseologisms are treated as independent, indivisible semantic components.
References
Chkhaidze, M. (1972). Avtomaturi targmanis saqitkhebi [Problems of automatic translation]. Metsniereba.
Drozdova, K. (2015). Mashinnyi perevod: Istoriya, klassifikatsiya, metody [Machine translation: History, classification, methods]. Gumanitarnye Issledovaniya, (3), 24–29.
Javakhishvili, M. (1956). Arsena Marabdeli (B. Korneev, Trans.). Zarya Vostoka. (Original work published 1933)
Javakhishvili, M. (2012). Arsena Marabdeli [Arsena of Marabda]. Bakur Sulakauri Publishing.
Kapanadze, O. (2016). Parallel TreeBanks: Observations for implication of equivalent alignments. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Applications, 7(1), 81–96.
Karimova, R. (2019). Sistemy avtomatizirovannogo perevoda i mashinnyi perevod [Automated translation systems and machine translation]. Flinta.
Kuznetsov, P. S., Lyapunov, A. A., & Reformatsky, A. A. (1956). Osnovnye problemy mashinnogo perevoda [Main problems of machine translation]. Voprosy Yazykoznaniya, (5), 107–111.
Tandashvili, M., & Khamarauli, M. (2021). Shesavali tsiprul qartvelologiashi [Introduction to digital Kartvelology]. Universali.
Tsabadze, Sh. (2025). Frazeologizmta mashinuri targmanis lingvisturi printsipobi qartuli da rusuli enebis bazaze [Linguistic principles of machine translation of phraseological units based on the Georgian and Russian languages]. Universali. https://doi.org/10.52340/PUTKARADZE/mngrph-978-9941-521-25-6
Vlakhov, S., & Florin, S. (1980). Neperevodimoe v perevode [Untranslatable in translation]. Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya.
Wood, M. (1986). Definition of idiom. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors Retain All Rights. Online Journal of Humanities ETAGTSU Has Only the Right of the First Publication.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.







